BOTRE V KACHI,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), PUNE

It emerges during the course of hearing that the CIT(A) has noted the assessee’s continuous non-appearance in 2 I.T.A.No. 499/PUN./2024 the lower appellate proceedings before rejecting the assessee’s contentions vide ex-parte order under challenge. Shri Murkunde could hardly dispute the clinching fact that the CIT(A)’s order has nowhere decided the assessee’s substantive grounds on merits as contemplated u/sec.250(6) of the Act requiring it to effectively framing any points of determination followed by a detailed adjudication thereof. Faced with the situation, I deem it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)- NFAC for it’s afresh adjudication, preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing, subject to the rider that it shall be the taxpayer’s onus and responsibility only to file and prove all the relevant facts in consequential proceedings.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.