NEENA KAILAS JADHAV ,THANE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश / ORDER
PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM : The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 01.11.2023 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”] pertaining to Assessment Year (“AY”) 2012-13.
The appeal came up for hearing on 29.05.2024. None appeared for the assessee. The Ld. DR, Shri R.Y. Balawade brought to our notice that the assessee has filed appeal twice by mistake. The appeal of the assessee had already been heard and adjudicated upon. He submitted before us a copy of the order dated 19.04.2024 of the Tribunal in assessee’s case for the same assessment year i.e. AY 2012-13 in ITA No. 901/PUN/2023. We, therefore, dismiss this assessee’s appeal as infructuous.
2 ITA No.809/PUN/2023, AY 2012-13
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26th June, 2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (Inturi Rama Rao) (Astha Chandra) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; दिन ांक / Dated : 26th June, 2024. रदि आदेश की प्रनिनलनप अग्रेनर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. धिभागीय प्रधिधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, “एक सदस्य मामला” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. ग र्ड फ़ इल / Guard File. 5. //सत्य दपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेश नुस र / BY ORDER,
िररष्ठ दनजी सदिि / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune