AJANTA REALTORS ASSOCIATES LIMITE LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP,AURANGABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

PDF
ITA 777/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 June 2024AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

Hearing: 27.06.2024Pronounced: 27.06.2024

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :

These assessee’s twin appeals for assessment year

2017-2018, arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre

[in short the “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order Nos.

ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1062039604(1) and 1062100571(1), dated 05.03.2024 and dated 06.03.2024, in proceedings

u/s.144 and 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the

Act”); respectively.

Heard both the parties. Case files perused.

2 ITA.No.777 & 778/PUN./2024

2.

Coming to the assessee’s ‘quantum’ appeal

ITA.No.777/PUN./2024, we find with the able assistance

coming from the Revenue side that the learned CIT(A)-NFAC

has taken into consideration the taxpayer’s continuous non-

appearance in the lower appellate discussion before rejecting

the assessee’s contentions vide ex-parte order under

challenge. Shri Keyur Patel & Shri Murkunde, CIT-DR & DR

could hardly dispute the clinching fact that the CIT(A)-NFAC’s

order has nowhere decided the assessee’s substantive grounds

on merits as contemplated u/sec.250(6) of the Act requiring it

to give points for determination followed by a detailed

adjudication thereof. Faced with the situation, we deem it

appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the

assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)-NFAC for it’s

afresh adjudication, preferably within three effective

opportunities of hearing, subject to the rider that it shall be

the taxpayer’s onus and responsibility only to file and prove all

the relevant facts in consequential proceedings. Ordered

accordingly.

3.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical

purposes in above terms.

4.

The assessee’s latter appeal ITA.No.778/PUN./2024

in sec.270A penalty also follows the suit being consequential

in nature in very terms. Ordered accordingly.

3 ITA.No.777 & 778/PUN./2024

5.

These assessee’s twin appeals I.T.A.Nos.777 &

778/PUN./2024 are allowed in above terms. A copy of this

common order be placed in the respective case files.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 27.06.2024.

Sd/- Sd/- [INTURI RAMA RAO] [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Pune, Dated 27th June, 2024

VBP/-

Copy to

1.

The appellant 2. The respondent 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune concerned 4. D.R. ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File.

//By Order// //True Copy //

Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Benches, Pune.

AJANTA REALTORS ASSOCIATES LIMITE LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP,AURANGABAD vs ACIT CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD | BharatTax