SHRIKANT GAJANAN VYAVAHARE,KAMATWADE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NASHIK

PDF
ITA 372/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 June 2024AY 2016-17Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE

For Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Addl.CIT

PER R. K. PANDA, VP :

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.09.2022 of the CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi confirming the penalty of Rs.82,093/- levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing despite service of notice.

3.

The Ld. DR filed a copy of the order of the Tribunal vide ITA No.893/PUN/2023, order dated 14.02.2024 for assessment year 2016-17 wherein

2 ITA No.372/PUN/2024

identical grounds have been raised by the assessee challenging the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer at Rs.82,093/- which has been sustained by the CIT(A) / NFAC. He submitted that the Tribunal in the said order has restored the issue to the file of CIT(A) / NFAC for de novo adjudication. Therefore, this being a duplicate appeal filed by the same assessee for the same assessment year, the same should be dismissed.

4.

We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the orders of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) / NFAC. A perusal of the order of the Tribunal vide ITA No.893/PUN/2023, dated 14.02.2024, it is seen that the assessee in the said appeal has challenged the order dated 29.09.2022 of the CIT(A) / NFAC levying the penalty of Rs.82,093/- levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Thus, this is a duplicate appeal filed by the same assessee for the same assessment year and therefore, is liable to be dismissed. We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee being a duplicate appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 27th June, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (VINAY BHAMORE) (R. K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दिन ांक Dated : 27th June, 2024 GCVSR

3 ITA No.372/PUN/2024

आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2. 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. 5. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

// True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 27.06.2024 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 27.06.2024 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the 3 JM/AM Second Member Draft discussed/approved by Second 4 AM/AM Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to the Head 9 Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order

SHRIKANT GAJANAN VYAVAHARE,KAMATWADE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, NASHIK | BharatTax