Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B(SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap
This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata dated 25.06.2015 for the assessment year 2008-09 on the following grounds:- 1. " That on the facts of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata, erred in law and on fact in deleting the addition of Rs.22,84,199/- on account of undisclosed investment of the assessee company without objectively dealing with the material, information, evidences available on records".
2. " That on the facts of the case read with ground no. 1 above, the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata, erred in deleting interest income of Rs.4,11,199/- in respect of addition of Rs.22,84,199/- on account of undisclosed investment of the assessee company".
3. "That on the facts of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata, erred in deleting of 25% of warehouse ./2015 Assessment year: 2008-2009 Page 2 of 3
charges debited by the assessee company amounting to Rs.4,24,668/-."
"That on the facts of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata, erred in allowing relief about the initiation of proceedings u/s, 271(l)(c) in consequence of deletion of addition of Rs.22,84,199/- on account of undisclosed investment of the assessee company."
"That on the facts of the case, the Ld.CIT(A)-2, Kolkata, erred in not allowing the A.O. to receive any notice of fixture from CIT(A) which is against the principles of natural justice."
2 As pointed out by the ld. counsel for the assessee at the outset, the tax effect involved in this appeal of the Revenue is less than the revised monetary limit recently fixed by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 at Rs.10,00,000/- for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal and this position clearly evident from the grounds raised by the Revenue in this appeal is not disputed even by the ld. D.R. In Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) recently issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs.10,00,000/- and as clarified in the said Circular, the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs.10,00,000/- may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Keeping in view the instruction given by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, which is squarely applicable in the present case, the appeal filed by the Revenue in this case is treated as withdrawn/not pressed and dismissed accordingly.