KASPER PIETER TIDEMAN,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), PUNE, PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee no longer felt aggrieved due to the favorable order from the CIT(A). The Department had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for AY 2020-21. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal as a favorable order was received from the CIT(A) on the same issue.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the allowability of foreign tax credit in case of belated filing of Form 67. The appeal was withdrawn due to a favorable subsequent order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश / ORDER
PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM :
The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21.11.2023 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Patna [“CIT(A)”] pertaining to Assessment Year (“AY”) 2020-21.
The assessee has filed an application dated 12.07.2024 to withdraw the appeal. The relevant extract of the application reads as under : “The appeal of the appellant against the Order u/s 154 for A.Y. 2020-21 on the very issue of allowability of foreign tax credit in case of belated filing of Form 67 was pending before the ld. CIT(A). It is brought to the attention of the Hon’ble Bench that the said appeal has been heard by the ld. CIT(A) and after considering the judicial decisions of various ITAT, the appeal has been decided in favour of the appellant vide order dated 10/07/2024. Copy of the said order of CIT(A) is enclosed herewith. Therefore the disallowance of foreign tax credit to the appellant has been deleted and the appellant has been granted the foreign tax credit for A.Y. 2020-21 in the appeal against 154 Order. In light of the above development the appellant is no more aggrieved for A.Y. 2020-21 and is therefore willing to withdraw the appeal in 143(1) for A.Y. 2020-21.”
Shri Nitin Patil, representing the Department submitted that the Department has no objection in case the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the above request of the assessee, the appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd July, 2024.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026