SHREEM ELECTRIC LIMITED,KOLHAPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE
।आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”बी” �ायपीठ पुणेम�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.898/PUN/2024 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year:2017-18 Shreem Electric Limited, V The Assistant Plot No.43 to 46, s Commissioner of Income L.K.Akiwate Industrial Tax, Estate, Jaysingpur, Shirol, Central Circle, Kolhapur. Kolhapur – 416144. PAN: AACCS4893C Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Sourabh Nayak -Addl.CIT(DR) Date of hearing 31/07/2024 Date of pronouncement 31/07/2024 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This is an appeal filed by Assessee against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal), Pune-11passed under section 250 of the Income tax Act, dated 31.01.2024 for the A.Y.2017-18. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : “1. The Learned CIT(A) erred in confirming penalty under section 270A of Rs.3,01,124/-.
ITA No.898/PUN/2024 Shreem Electric Limited, Kolhapur[A] 2. The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that, since the addition is made on adhoc basis, no penalty can be levied. 3. The penalty levied may please be delete. 4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete any of the Above grounds of appeal.” 2. There is a delay of two months of filing appeal before this Tribunal. Considering the reasons mentioned in the Affidavit, we are convinced with the reasons for delay and in the larger interest of justice, we condone the delay.
At the outset of hearing, none appeared for the assessee nor any adjournment letter filed. Even on earlier hearing i.e.08.07.2024 no one had appeared and no adjournment letter was filed. In these facts and circumstances, we heard the appeal ex- parte.
We have heard ld.DR for the Revenue and perused the records.
In this case, Assessing Officer(AO) has levied penalty u/sec.270A of the Act of 200% on account of under-reporting in consequences of mis-reporting of income. The assessee’s case was reopened for A.Y.2017-18 for the alleged reasons that assessee had
ITA No.898/PUN/2024 Shreem Electric Limited, Kolhapur[A] received accommodation entry from M/s.ABN Trade Link Pvt. Limited. During the assessment proceedings, assessee submitted an affidavit that there were no purchases from ABN Trade Link Pvt. Ltd., during the year. Therefore, the Assessing Officer(AO) sought information from the Investigation Wing, Mumbai. The Investigation Wing, Mumbai submitted that M/s.RadianceMultitrade Pvt. Ltd., had provided accommodation entries of Rs.1,26,32,550/- to M/s.Shreem Electric Ltd., for F.Y.2016-17. The assessee was asked to file a reply by the Assessing Officer. The relevant paragraph appearing in the penalty order is reproduced here as under : “ The assessee in reply stated that it had purchased vacuum drying and impregnation plant for capacitors and PLC based automation machinery from M/s Radiance Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. for consideration of Rs.1.41,08.550/- inclusive of VAT. In support, the assessee submitted copies of ledger extract, quotation, purchase bills, LR copies, installation certificate of inspector etc. The AO had considered the submission of the assessee. On verification it was seen that the assessee had capitalized the purchases in fixed assets on which depreciation was claimed. In the circumstance in the case of M/s Shreem construction which is belonging to the assessee group, the Ld.CIT(A) for AY 2007-08 and 2008-09 restricted the disallowance to 20% of total purchases from suspicious dealers. Borrowing the analogy from the decision of CIT(A) and after considering the evidence submitted by the
ITA No.898/PUN/2024 Shreem Electric Limited, Kolhapur[A] assessee in support of purchase of machinery, the AO disallowed the depreciation to the 20% on account of machinery purchases from M/s Raidance Multi Trade Pvt. Ltd. Further, the AO also initiated penalty u/s 270A of the Act for underreporting of income in consequence of misreporting of income.”
Thus, in this case, in the assessment order, AO has not disallowed the so-called purchases made from Radiance Multitrade Pvt. Limited. It means, AO accepted genuineness of these purchases. All the details related to purchases were filed by the assessee. However, AO has disallowed an estimated 20% of depreciation on account of machineries which were purchased from Radiance Multitrade Pvt. Ltd., Thus, AO has merely made an ad-hoc disallowance of depreciation. Though in the penalty order, it is alleged that there were bogus purchases, however, in the assessment order, Assessee has not disallowed the so-called bogus purchases.In this case, books of accounts has not been rejected by the Assessing Officer(AO). Therefore, in these facts and circumstances of the case, when assessee has accepted the genuineness of the purchases, the ad-hoc disallowance of depreciation cannot be held to be underreporting of income in consequence of misreporting of income, as per section 270A(6) of the Act. Therefore, we direct the Assessing Officer to delete the
ITA No.898/PUN/2024 Shreem Electric Limited, Kolhapur[A] penalty. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 31st July, 2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.GODARA) (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 31st July, 2024/ SGR* आदेशक��ितिलिपअ�ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. िवभागीय�ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “बी” ब�च, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाड�फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.
