SANGLI DISTRICT LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OP. SOCIETIES CO-OP. FEDERATION LIMITED SANGLI.,SANGLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SANGLI,MAHARASHTRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(vi) as the income was not derived from the collective disposal of labour. However, it directed the AO to verify and allow the deduction for interest income under Section 80P(2)(d) if conditions were met.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(vi) for income from collective disposal of labour and under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income. The AO disallowed both claims, and the CIT(A)/NFAC upheld the disallowance of Section 80P(2)(a)(vi) and the denial of Section 80P(2)(d) deduction due to no claim in the return.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(vi) for income from collective labour disposal and whether interest income earned from FDs with a cooperative bank is deductible under Section 80P(2)(d) even if not claimed in the original return.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश / ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 06.12.2023 for the assessment year 2021-22.
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a Cooperative society duly registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. It is engaged in federation of labour societies under Sangli District. The Return of Income for the A.Y.2021-22 was filed on 04.02.2022 declaring total income of Rs.63,016/- after claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’). Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 09.12.2022 u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act at a total income of Rs.65,68,330/-. While doing so, the AO had disallowed the claim for deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act on the ground that the income shown in the return of income was not derived from the collective disposal of labour. The AO also had disallowed the interest of Rs.22,77,800/- claimed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act on the ground that such deduction was not claimed in the return of income.
Being aggrieved, an appeal was preferred before the CIT(A)/NFAC, who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the AO by observing that the appellant society had not derived the income from the activity as envisaged u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act. As regards the deduction of interest income of Rs.22,77,800/- derived by the appellant society from the FDs with Sangli District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. u/s.80P(2)(d), the CIT(A)/NFAC upheld the denial of deduction made by the AO on the ground that no such claim was made in the return of income.
Being aggrieved, the appellant society is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal.
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. As regards the ground relating to eligibility of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) in respect of income derived from the activity of collective disposal of labour of its members, the AO observed that the appellant society had not derived income from the above activity. The nature of income derived by the appellant society had been extracted by the AO vide para 3.1 of the assessment order. On mere perusal of the contents of this para, it would reveal that the appellant society had not derived income from the activity of collective disposal of labour of its members. Therefore, we have no hesitation to hold that the appellant society is not entitled for deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act.
As regards the claim of deduction of interest income on FDs made with Sangli District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. amounting to Rs.22,77,800/-, we are of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would meet if the matter is restored to the file of Assessing Officer with a direction to allow the deduction, on due verification, on being satisfied that the interest income is earned from a Cooperative Society/Cooperative Bank, subject to fulfillment of other conditions.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced on this 05th day of August, 2024.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(vi)
- Shri Samarth Sahakari Majoor Sansth… vs ITO Ward-5, PanvelITA 6343/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed14 May 2026AY 2013-14
- Irula Snake Catchers Industrial Co-Op… vs ITO, Ward-22(1), ChennaiITA 1790/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
- Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 and Tps, Kannur vs Kannur Building Materials Co Operative…ITA 600/COCH/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed29 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
- Government Printing Press Employee Credit… vs ITO, Ward 7(1), PuneITA 793/PUN/2025[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2025AY 2019-2020
- Jalgaon Jilha Majur Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha… vs ITO Ward 1(4), JalgaonITA 30/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026