SUMMIT SPORTS PVT LTD,PUNE vs. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CPC, BANGLORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 620/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 August 2024AY 2019-20Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the prevailing circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to inordinate delay in filing. The assessee contended that the delay was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the order was not brought to their notice promptly.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic and if the appeal should be adjudicated on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 234B,Section 234C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Shivaji
For Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Srivastava
Hearing: 04.07.2024Pronounced: 20.08.2024

Assessment Year : 2019-20 Summit Sports Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Addl. DIT, CPC, T-170, MIDC, Bhosari, Banglore. Pune- 411026. PAN : AATCS8122M Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Akshay Shivaji Revenue by : Shri Akhilesh Srivastava Date of hearing : 04.07.2024 Date of pronouncement : 20.08.2024 आदेश / ORDER

PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 15.02.2024 passed by Ld Addl./JCIT(A), Jodhpur for the assessment year 2019-20.

2.

The appellant raised the following grounds of appeal :-

1. At the time of Assessment, Learned Assessing Authority passed assessment order and disallowed claim of TDS on account of mismatch with 26AS.

2. The learned Assessing Authority levied excess interest u/s 2234B & 234C without considering tax payment which is unjustified.

3. At the first hearing of an Appeal, the appellant authority dismissed the appeal on account of appeal is not maintainable as there is inordinate delay in filing an appeal which cannot be condoned without considering the facts of the case which is unjustified.”

3. At the outset, during the course of hearing of the present appeal, the son of the director of the company appeared & requested for short adjournment. We find that the order dismissing the first appeal of the assessee on the ground of delayed filing of the appeal is unjustified. We therefore reject the request for adjournment & proceed to decide the appeal. It is found that the order u/s 143(1) was passed on 19-05-2020, but due to covid-19 pandemic situation the order could not be seen by the assessee & thereafter as soon as the order came into knowledge of the assessee the first appeal was filed belatedly. In the grounds of appeal it was requested before the bench to set-aside the order passed by LD CIT(A)/NFAC & further prayed to provide just & proper relief to the assessee. We find that due to covid-19 pandemic the Hon’ble Supreme Court has already extended the limitation upto 30-05-2022 & therefore taking the lenient view the delay can be calculated after 30-05-2022. Considering the totality of the facts & special circumstances which were prevailing due to covid-19 pandemic & also in the light of judgement passed in the case of Collector Land Acquisition vs. MST Katiji by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the interest of justice, without going into merits of the case, we deem it appropriate to set- aside the order passed by LD CIT(A)/NFAC with a direction to condone the delay & adjudicate the appeal on the merits of the case

More judgments on Section 234B

All 10,214 judgments and leading authorities on Section 234B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →