SUMMIT SPORTS PVT LTD,PUNE vs. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CPC, BANGLORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the prevailing circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Supreme Court's extension of limitation periods. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) due to inordinate delay in filing. The assessee contended that the delay was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the order was not brought to their notice promptly.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic and if the appeal should be adjudicated on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Assessment Year : 2019-20 Summit Sports Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Addl. DIT, CPC, T-170, MIDC, Bhosari, Banglore. Pune- 411026. PAN : AATCS8122M Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Akshay Shivaji Revenue by : Shri Akhilesh Srivastava Date of hearing : 04.07.2024 Date of pronouncement : 20.08.2024 आदेश / ORDER
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 15.02.2024 passed by Ld Addl./JCIT(A), Jodhpur for the assessment year 2019-20.
The appellant raised the following grounds of appeal :-
1. At the time of Assessment, Learned Assessing Authority passed assessment order and disallowed claim of TDS on account of mismatch with 26AS.
2. The learned Assessing Authority levied excess interest u/s 2234B & 234C without considering tax payment which is unjustified.
3. At the first hearing of an Appeal, the appellant authority dismissed the appeal on account of appeal is not maintainable as there is inordinate delay in filing an appeal which cannot be condoned without considering the facts of the case which is unjustified.”
3. At the outset, during the course of hearing of the present appeal, the son of the director of the company appeared & requested for short adjournment. We find that the order dismissing the first appeal of the assessee on the ground of delayed filing of the appeal is unjustified. We therefore reject the request for adjournment & proceed to decide the appeal. It is found that the order u/s 143(1) was passed on 19-05-2020, but due to covid-19 pandemic situation the order could not be seen by the assessee & thereafter as soon as the order came into knowledge of the assessee the first appeal was filed belatedly. In the grounds of appeal it was requested before the bench to set-aside the order passed by LD CIT(A)/NFAC & further prayed to provide just & proper relief to the assessee. We find that due to covid-19 pandemic the Hon’ble Supreme Court has already extended the limitation upto 30-05-2022 & therefore taking the lenient view the delay can be calculated after 30-05-2022. Considering the totality of the facts & special circumstances which were prevailing due to covid-19 pandemic & also in the light of judgement passed in the case of Collector Land Acquisition vs. MST Katiji by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the interest of justice, without going into merits of the case, we deem it appropriate to set- aside the order passed by LD CIT(A)/NFAC with a direction to condone the delay & adjudicate the appeal on the merits of the case
More judgments on Section 234B
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026