SHRI GULABRAO ESHWARA KHANDVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE

PDF
ITA 860/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 August 2024Bench: SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA (Vice President), SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” : PUNE

Before: SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA & SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

Hearing: 29.08.2024Pronounced: 30.08.2024

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :

This assessee’s appeal, arise against the CIT

(Exemption), Pune, Pune’s Din and Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/1062421136(1), dated 11.03.2024, involving proceedings u/s.12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961

(in short “the Act”).

Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s

behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

2.

Learned CIT-DR vehemently argued during the

course of hearing that the CIT(E) herein has rightly declined

the assessee’s sec.12A registration on account of the latter’s

2 ITA.No.860/PUN./2024

failure in filing all the relevant details in the corresponding

proceedings. Mr. Ajay further takes us to the CIT(E) detailed

discussion in para-4 that the assessee had not even proved

genuineness of it’s activities during registration proceedings.

3.

We have given our thoughtful consideration to the

assessee’s pleadings and Revenue’s foregoing contentions. We

find from a perusal of the CIT(E)’s impugned order that he has

not even discussed the assessee’s object clauses in the trust

deed as to under which limb the case is covered i.e., whether

for the specified charitable objects or under the last head of

general public utility. This is indeed coupled with the fact that

the CIT(E) had granted last opportunity on 01.03.2024

followed by his impugned order dated 11.03.2024 and

therefore, possibility of some communication gaps at

assessee’s behest also could not be altogether ruled-out. Be

that as it may, we deem it appropriate in the larger interest of

justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the

CIT(E) for his afresh appropriate adjudication as per law,

preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing,

subject to the rider that it shall be the assessee’s onus and

responsibility only to file and prove all the relevant facts in

consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical

purposes in above terms.

3 ITA.No.860/PUN./2024

Order pronounced in the open Court on 30.08.2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (RAMA KANTA PANDA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER

Pune, Dated 30th August, 2024

VBP/-

Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3 The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File.

BY ORDER,

// TRUE COPY //

Senior Private Secretary ITAT, Pune.

SHRI GULABRAO ESHWARA KHANDVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION,PUNE vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE | BharatTax