PDKV RESEARCH AND INCUBATION FOUNDATION ,AKOLA vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PUNE
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: HON’BLE SHRI S. S. GODARA & SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
(Through Virtual hearing from ITAT, Pune) BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीलसं. / ITA No. 235/NAG/2023 PDKV Research & Incubation Foundation Krishi Nagar, Shivani Airport Area, Akola-444004 PAN:AAKCP6318F . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant
बनाम / V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee by : Mr Mahavir Atal [‘Ld. AR’] Revenue by : Mr K C Kanojiya [‘Ld. DR’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusive Hearing : 21/03/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 21/03/2024 आदेश / ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; This appeal challenges the DIN & Order No ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2022- 23/1051695817(1) dt. 30/03/2023 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [in short ‘CIT(E)’] u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’].
At the outset, after vouching sufficiency of reasons beyond undeliberate 57 days delay in instituting this appeal, in the larger interest of justice placing reliance on ‘Vijay Vishin Meghani Vs. DCIT & Anr’ reported 398 ITR 250 (Bom) and ‘Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Anr. Vs Ms Katiji and Others’ [167 ITR 5 (SC)], we deem it fit to condone the delay.
ITAT-Nagpur Page 1 of 3
PDKV Research & Incubation Foundation ITA No.235/PUN/2023
Briefly stated facts borne out of the case records are; 3.1 The appellant is a section 8 company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 which vide its Application No. CIT Exemption Pune/2022- 23/12AA/12372 dt. 24/09/2022 in Form 10AB applied for registration u/c (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act.
3.2 The Ld. CIT(E) in-order to verify the objects, genuineness of activities and to ascertain the fulfilment of conditions for granting registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act, was put the appellant to a notice dt. 31/12/2022 thereby called upon certain additional documents. After examining the submission of the assessee, the Ld. CIT(E) vide para 3.1 rejected the application on appellant’s failure to produce the copy of regular registration u/s 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) or 10(23) of the Act, as the appellant was not being falling in any of the exempted category.
3.3 Aggrieved appellant came in appeal with a prayer of remand owning to its 12AB registration pending before the registering authority.
We have heard the rival contentions on the sole & substantive grievance; and subject to the provisions of rule 18 of ITAT Rules, 1963, perused the material placed on record. Ostensibly, the appellant company failed produce certificate of regular registration granted to it u/s 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act, as a consequence the Ld. CIT(E) without further opportunity to the appellant rejected the application in violation of principle of natural justice as directed by clause (ii)(b)(B) of 2nd proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act.
ITAT-Nagpur Page 2 of 3
PDKV Research & Incubation Foundation ITA No.235/PUN/2023
We note that, the appellant’s application for regular registration u/s 12AB of the Act was rejected by an order dt. 30/03/2023. When the appellant challenged the said rejection in an appeal, the Co-ordinate bench vide its order in ITA No. 230/NAG/2023 dt. 20/03/2024 remanded the matter to the registering authority for de-nova consideration. In these given circumstances, we therefore are of the considered view that, it shall be pre-mature to deal with the present appeal on merits as the appellant in all the fairness would be able to produce the copy of 12AB registration only when the matter is decided by the Ld. CIT(E) conclusively.
For the aforestated reasons, without commenting on the merits, we deem it fit to set-aside the impugned rejection and restore the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) with the direction to deal therewith a fresh in accordance with law however after considering the finality of appellant’s application for registration u/s 12AB of the Act. Ergo ordered accordingly.
In result, the appeal is ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. In terms of rule 34 of ITAT Rules, the order pronounced in the open court on this Thursday, 21th day of March, 2024.
-S/d- -S/d- S. S. GODARA G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / PUNE ; ददनाांक / Dated : 21th day of March, 2024. आदेश की प्रतितलतप अग्रेतिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपीलाथी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune 4. The Pr. CIT(E), Pune 5. DR, ITAT, Nagpur Bench, 6. गार्डफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / By Order, वररष्ठ दनजी सदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकरअपीलीय न्यायादधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
ITAT-Nagpur Page 3 of 3
