VERENDRA SINGH SAINI,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD -11(3), PUNE

PDF
ITA 1606/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 September 2024AY 2019-20Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member)2 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “SMC” BENCH : PUNE

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

Hearing: 25.09.2024Pronounced: 26.09.2024

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M.

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2019-

2020, arises against the CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal

Centre [in short the “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order No.ITBA/

NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1037891358(1), dated 17.12.2021, in

proceedings u/s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short

“the Act”).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

Learned counsel at the outset submits that he

assessee’s present case ITA.No.1606/PUN./2024 is in fact a

2 ITA.No.1606/PUN./2024

‘duplicate’ case file and the learned coordinate bench has

already dismissed his former appeal ITA.No.1483/PUN./2024

on 19.09.2024 raising the very substantive grounds.

Dismissed accordingly.

3.

This assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 26.09.2024.

Sd/- Sd/- [INTURI RAMA RAO] [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Pune, Dated 26th September, 2024 VBP/- Copy to 1. The appellant 2. The respondent 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune concerned 4. D.R. ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File. //By Order//

//True Copy //

Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Benches, Pune.

VERENDRA SINGH SAINI,HARYANA vs ITO WARD -11(3), PUNE | BharatTax