Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH C, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. N. V. VASUDEVAN
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal is filed by assessee directed against an order of CIT (A)- 4, Bangalore, dt 13.02.2015, for the A. Y. 2006-07.
When the case was called up for hearing, nobody appeared for assessee.
It is seen from records that inspite of the date of hearing being mentioned in the acknowledgement-cum-notice, which was served on the assessee by registered ITA.612/Bang/2015 Page - 2 post acknowledgement due, nobody was present on the date of hearing. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its case. We dismiss the appeals following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the ITAT in CIT v. Multiplan India P.Ltd., (1991) 38 ITD 320 and of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukoji Rao Holkar v. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, as the appeal is infructuous for non-prosecution.