DDIT (E)-1(1), MUMBAI vs. THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to claim exemption under Section 11 of the Act. This decision was based on previous Tribunal and High Court orders confirming similar claims.
What were the facts?
The assessee, MHADA, a statutory authority, lost exemption under Section 10(20A) and obtained registration under Section 12AA. The AO rejected its claim for exemption under Section 11, but the CIT(A) allowed it.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, a statutory authority registered under Section 12AA, is eligible for exemption under Section 11 after the omission of Section 10(20A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN (AM) & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (JM)
The appeal of the revenue is directed against the order dated 25.02.2008 passed by ld CIT(A)-32, Mumbai for assessment year 2004- 05, wherein the Ld CIT(A) has held that the assessee is entitled to claim exemption u/s 11 of the Act.
The assessee is a statutory authority constituted under a law enacted by the Government of Maharashtra. The assessee had enjoyed exemption u/s 10(20A) of the Act upto the assessment year 2002-03. Section 10(20A) was omitted by the Finance Act 2002 with 2 The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority effect from AY 2003-04. Accordingly, the assessee applied for registration u/s 12AA of the Act as a charitable institution and the Director of Income tax (Exemption) granted registration to the assessee on 24.2.2003. Accordingly the assessee claimed exemption u/s 11 of the Act for the year under consideration and the same was rejected by the AO. However, the Ld CIT(A) allowed the claim and hence the revenue has filed this appeal before us.
At the time of hearing, it was submitted that the AO has rejected similar claim made in AY 2007-08 also and the Tribunal has allowed the claim of the assessee, vide its order dated 16.11.2011 passed in ITA No. 5758/Mum/2010. It was also submitted that the above said order of the Tribunal has since been confirmed by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, vide its order dated 08.08.2014 passed in of 2012.
Since the view taken by the Ld CIT(A) finds support from the order of the Hon’ble High Court, referred above, we do not find any reason to interfere with his order passed on the impugned issue.
In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 4th May, 2016.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026