TRIANZ HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as it had become infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an assessment order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee requested to withdraw it.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal filed before the ITAT. The consequence of such withdrawal on the pending appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘ B ’
Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI JASON P. BOAZ
O R D E R Per Shri Jason P. Boaz, A.M. : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of assessment for Assessment Year 2010-11 passed under Section 143(3) rws 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') dt.30.1.2015 in pursuance of the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (‘DRP’), Bangalore. 2. In the course of hearing of the appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11, the learned Authorised Representative filed a petition dt.5.5.2015 requesting for withdrawal of this appeal
2 IT(TP)A No.538/Bang/2015 before the Tribunal. In the forwarding letter dt.6.5.2015 enclosing the aforesaid petition, it is submitted as under : “ ….. The assessee now intends to withdraw the appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11 consequent to the revised directions issued by the DRP and rectification order passed by the Assessing Officer.”
In view of the assessee's request for withdrawal of this appeal filed before the Tribunal for Assessment Year 2010-11, the same is allowed to be withdrawn and consequently being rendered infructuous is accordingly dismissed.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed for Assessment Year 2010-11. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th July, 2015.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026