DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. UNITY BUILDWELL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5736/DEL/2013Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 January 2016AY 2009-104 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, following the CBDT circular. The Cross Objection was dismissed as it was not pressed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT, but the tax effect involved was less than the revised monetary limit of Rs. 10,00,000 for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015. The assessee's Cross Objection was not pressed.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeals are maintainable before the ITAT when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit set by CBDT circulars. Whether the assessee's Cross Objection should be dismissed if not pressed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : H : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Jain, CA, Shri Rajiv Ranka, Sr. DR
Hearing: 28.01.2016Pronounced: 28.01.2016

Heard together (2 matters)

CO No.129/Del/2014
ITA No.3126/Del/2013

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER BENCH: These three appeals by the Revenue and the Cross Objection by the assessee arise out of the orders passed by the CIT(A) in relation to the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2004-05.

2.

During the course of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that pursuant to the mandate of section 268A, the CBDT has issued Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 with retrospective effect, revising the monetary limit to Rs.10,00,000/- for not filing appeals before the Tribunal. He further submitted that as the tax effect involved in the instant appeals of the Revenue is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, the extant appeals are not , 5737 & 3126/Del/2013 CO No.129/Del/2014 maintainable. The ld. D.R., although supported the order of the Assessing Officer, but could not controvert the fact that tax effect involved in these appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-.

3.

From para 10 of the above Circular it is palpable that the Instruction is applicable to the pending appeals also with retrospective effect and there is a clear-cut direction to the Department to withdraw or not press such appeals filed before the ITAT wherein tax effect is less than Rs.10,00,000/-. Going by the prescription of the aforenoted Circular, we are of the view that the Revenue should have either not filed the present appeals before the Tribunal or withdrawn the same as the tax effect in these appeals is admittedly less than the prescribed limit for not filing the appeals. Ex conseqeunti we dismiss the instant appeals without going into merits of these cases.

4.

The Cross Objection was not pressed by the ld. AR and the same is, dismissed as such. , 5737 & 3126/Del/2013 CO No.129/Del/2014 5. In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and the Cross Objection of the assessee stand dismissed.

Order Pronounced in the open Court on 28.01.2016.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →