ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. ZEUS POWER SOLUTIONS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular, with retrospective effect, mandates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 10,00,000/- should not be pressed or withdrawn. Therefore, the instant appeals are not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment year 2003-04. The assessee's representative pointed out that the CBDT's circular revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 10,00,000/-, and the tax effect in these appeals was below this limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue are maintainable before the Tribunal given the revised monetary limits for appeals stipulated by the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : H : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
PER R.S. SYAL, AM:
These appeals by the Revenue arise out of the orders passed by the CIT(A) in relation to the assessment year 2003- 04.
During the course of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that pursuant to the mandate of section 268A, the CBDT has issued Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 with retrospective effect, revising the monetary limit to Rs.10,00,000/- for not filing appeals before the Tribunal. He further submitted that as the tax effect involved in the instant appeals is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, the extant appeals are not maintainable. The ld. D.R., although supported the order of the Assessing Officer, but could not controvert the fact that tax effect involved in these appeals is less than Rs.10,00,000/-.
From para 10 of the above Circular it is palpable that the Instruction is applicable to the pending appeals also with retrospective effect and there is a clear-cut direction to the Department to withdraw or not press such appeals filed before the ITAT wherein tax effect is less than Rs.10,00,000/-. Going by the prescription of the aforenoted Circular, we are of the view that the Revenue should have either not filed the instant appeals before the Tribunal or withdrawn the same as the tax effect in these appeals is admittedly less than the prescribed limit for not filing the appeals. Ex conseqeunti we dismiss the instant appeals without going into merits of these cases.
In the result, the appeals of the Revenue stand dismissed.
Order Pronounced in the open Court on 29.01.2016.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026