ITO, KOLAR vs. SRI. M. VEERABHADRAPPA, MALUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit. This decision was based on previous coordinate bench rulings and the objective of reducing litigation.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT, and if the revised monetary limit applies to appeals filed before its issuance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. CIT vs. Sureshchandra Durgaprasad Khatod (HUF)3 citing253 CTR 492 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘C’, BANGALORE
Before: SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JM (SMC)
PER SMT ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JM:
This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order of CIT(A)-
V, Bangalore dated 14-10-2013 for the assessment year 2005-06. 2. We have heard both sides and also perused the material on record.
At the outset, it is observed that the tax effect involved in this appeal of the revenue is less than the monetary limit of Rs.4.00 lakhs
prescribed by the CBDT for filing the appeal before this Tribunal and the same therefore, is not maintainable. Although, the learned DR has not disputed the fact that the tax effect involved in this appeal of the revenue is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs, he has contended that the 2 ITA No.305(B)/2014 revised monetary limit of Rs.4.00 lakhs
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026