Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S. SIDHU & SHRI L.P. SAHU
This appeal by the Department is directed against the Order dated 31.8.2010 of Ld. CIT(A)-Meerut pertaining to assessment year 1996-97 on the following grounds:- “
1. Whether Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in adjudicating the issues on an order issued u/s. 254 of the I.T. Act, 1961 issued in pursuance to the directions of the Hon’ble ITAT exceeding his powers as under the provisions of section 246A of the I.T. Act, 1961. Revision under section 254 is not appellate order.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) may be set aside and that of the AO restored.
2. At the time of hearing Ld. Counsel of the Assessee has stated that the tax effect involved in this Appeal is below the prescribed limit of Rs. 10,00,000/-, hence the same is not maintainable and may be dismissed accordingly. 2.1 Ld. DR did not contovert the submissions made by the Ld. Counsel of the Assessee, but he relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Meerut.
After hearing both the parties and perusing the records, we find that the tax effect in the Revenue’s Appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, therefore, the Department’s Appeal is not maintainable, in view of the Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt.) by the CBDT. For the sake of convenience, the relevant para nos. 3 & 10 of the aforesaid CBDT’s Circular are reproduced as under:- “3. Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder: Monetary Limit S No Appeals in Income-tax matters (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.
This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.”
It is not in dispute that the Board’s instruction or directions issued to the income-tax authorities are binding on those authorities, therefore, the Department should have withdrawn/ not pressed the present Appeal, in view of the aforesaid instructions since the tax effect in the instant Appeal is less than the amount of Rs. 10 lacs, prescribed in the above said CBDT’s Instructions.
Keeping in view the CBDT Instruction No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015, we are of the view that the Revenue should have withdrawn/ not pressed the instant appeal before the Tribunal. We are also of the view that the said Instructions are applicable for the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunal. Accordingly, the Revenue’s Appeal is dismissed.
In the result, Appeal filed by the Revenue Stands dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 05/02/2016.