DCIT, CIR-2, SILIGURI, SILIGURI vs. SRINIWAS AGARWAL, SILIGURI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1391/KOL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 August 2016AY 2010-113 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect, following CBDT Circular No. 21/2015. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was rendered infructuous.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(Appeals). The assessee had also filed a cross-objection. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT circulars.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Heard together (2 matters)

C.O. 85/KOL/2014
I.T.A. No. 1391/KOL/ 2014

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Date of concluding the hearing : August 29, 2016 Date of pronouncing the order : August 29, 2016

O R D E R This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalpaiguri dated 25.04.2014 and ./2014 Assessment year: 2010-2011 & C.O. 85/KOL/2014 (arising out of Assessment Year: 2010-2011 Page 2 of 3 the same is being disposed of along with the Cross Objection filed by the assessee being C.O. No. 85/KOL/2014.

2.

As pointed out by the ld. Counsel for the assessee at the time of hearing today, the tax effect involved in this appeal of the Revenue is less than the monetary limit of Rs.10,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT for filing the Revenue’s appeal before the Tribunal and this position clearly evident from the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) is not disputed even by the ld. D.R. In Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) recently issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs.10,00,000/- and as clarified in the said Circular, the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs.10,00,000/- may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Keeping in view the instruction given by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, which is squarely applicable in the present case, the appeal filed by the Revenue in this case is treated as withdrawn/not pressed and dismissed accordingly.

3.

As a result of dismissal of the Revenue’s appeal by me as not maintainable on account of low tax effect, the corresponding Cross Objection filed by the assessee has become infructuous as agreed even by the ld. counsel for the assessee. The same is accordingly dismissed.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →