M/S TEZPUR TERAPANTH FOUNDATION,ASSAM vs. CIT, (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemptions) order was passed ex-parte and therefore needed to be set aside. The matter was remanded to the CIT(Exemptions) for fresh consideration after providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for approval under Section 80G(5) was dismissed by the CIT(Exemptions) because the notice of hearing was returned unserved. The assessee argued that since they had already received recognition under Section 12AA, their activities were genuine.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) order dismissing the application for 80G approval without affording an opportunity of hearing to the assessee is valid, especially when the assessee has 12AA registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘C’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri N. V. Vasudevan,J.M. & Shri M. Balaganesh, A.M.)
ORDER Per Shri N. V. Vasudevan, J.M.
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 16/10/2015 passed u/s.80G (5) of the Income-tax Act 1961(Act) refusing grant of approval to the assessee trust u/s.80G(5) of the Act.
The impugned order was passed dismissing the application of the Assessee as the notice of hearing sent to the Assessee was returned un-served and therefore there was no means of verifying the genuineness of the activities of the Assessee. The limited prayer of the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee is for setting aside the order of the CIT(Exemption) and remanding the question of grant of registration u/s.80G(5) for fresh consideration by the CIT(Exemption) especially in the light of recognition granted u/s.12AA dated 30.04.2015. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the Assessee that in the light of the recognition granted u/s.12AA of the ITA No.1447/Kol/2015-M/s. Tezpur Terapanth Foundation 2 Act, there can be no manner of doubt about the genuineness of the activities of the Assessee.
We are of the view, that since the proceedings before the CIT (Exemption) were ex-parte proceedings the impugned order has to be set aside on the question of granting approval u/s.80G(5) should be remanded to the CIT (Exemption) for fresh consideration after affording opportunity of being heard to the assessee. We hold and direct accordingly.
In the result appeal of the assessee is stated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 19.10.2016
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026