DDIT (E)-1(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect on the disputed amount was below the threshold specified in CBDT Circular No. 21/2015. This circular mandates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 10.00 lacs are not maintainable before the ITAT.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2008-09. The total quantum under dispute was Rs. 17,52,540/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to low tax effect, as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI
Before: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumar
O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh, Judicial Member
This appeal by revenue is arising out of the order of the CIT(A) – 1, Mumbai, in appeal No.CIT(A)-I/IT/E-1(233)/10-11 dated 13.02.2012. The assessment was framed by the Dy.DIT(E)-I(1), Mumbai, for A.Y. 2008-09 vide his order dated 28.12.2010 u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
At the outset, it is noticed that the total quantum under dispute involved in this Revenue’s appeal amounts to Rs.17,52,540/-. The tax effect on this quantum addition at the maximum marginal rate of tax would be at Rs.5,25,771/-. Since the tax effect is involved in the appeal is low, the same is covered vide CBDT Circular
Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran No Circular No.21/2015 dated 10/12/2015. As the issue is covered by CBDT Circular, which mandates that the tax effect involving less than Rs. 10.00 lacs is not maintainable before ITAT and this circular also applies to pending appeals, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on this day of 27th May 2016.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026