ITO, HUBLI vs. THE WEST COAST PAPER MILL EMPLOYEES SOUHARDA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LTD., DANDELI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 80P(4) applies only to cooperative banks, not credit cooperative societies. Therefore, the assessee, being a credit cooperative society, is eligible for the deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society registered under the Karnataka Souhardha Cooperative Act, 1997, provided credit facilities to its members and claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO denied this deduction, viewing the assessee as a cooperative bank ineligible due to Section 80P(4).
What were the issues?
Whether a credit cooperative society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members is considered a 'cooperative bank' for the purposes of Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, thereby disentitling it to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
Per N.V. Vasudevan, Judicial Member This appeal by the Revenue is against the order dated 11.02.2015 of the CIT(Appeals), Hubballi relating to assessment year 2010-11. 2. In this appeal, the Revenue has challenged the order of CIT(Appeals) allowing exemption to the assessee u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, holding that the assessee is a co-operative society and not a co- operative bank and therefore the provisions of section 80P(4) of the Act are not applicable.
The assessee is a co-operative society registered under the Karnataka Souhardha Cooperative Act, 1997. It is engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026