ITO, BANGALORE vs. M/S OFFSHORE ANALYTICS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that deduction under Section 10A of the Act should be allowed on the assessed income, which includes profits enhanced due to disallowances. This decision was based on the reasoning that there is no statutory provision to exclude such enhanced profits from the Section 10A calculation.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed a certain amount under Section 40(a)(ia) and consequently did not allow deduction under Section 10A on the enhanced profits. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance but allowed Section 10A deduction on the enhanced profits, relying on a coordinate bench decision.
What were the issues?
Whether enhanced profits arising from disallowances are eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.207 citing330 ITR 175 · 2011 · HC
- Rahul Kumar Bajat v. Income Tax Officer4 citing69 ITD 1 · 1999 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH C, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. N. V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI. ABRAHAM P. GEORGE
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
In this appeal filed by Revenue, its grievance is that CIT (A) allowed enhanced deduction u/s.10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ in short), to the assessee relying on the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of Bearing Point Business v. DCIT [MP.No.45/Bang/2013, dt.05.07.2013).
Facts apropos are that assessee had claimed deduction u/s.10A of the Act which was duly allowed to it. However, there was a disallowance of ITA.737/Bang/2014 Page - 2
Rs.2,60,21,089/-, u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act. On such disallowance the AO did not allow deduction u/s.10A of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026