PUBLIC EDUCATION SOCIETY,BANGALORE vs. DY.DIT, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the expression 'such income' in Section 11(1)(a) refers to gross income, not net income after deducting administrative expenditure. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to accumulate 15% of its gross receipts.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an educational society, declared NIL income after applying funds towards its objects, including salaries and acquisition of fixed assets. The Assessing Officer and CIT(Appeals) were of the view that only net income, after deducting revenue expenditure incurred for earning fees, should be considered for accumulation limits.
What were the issues?
Whether 'income' for the purpose of Section 11(1)(a) refers to gross receipts or net income after deducting expenditure incurred for earning such receipts in the case of an educational institution.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Programme for Community Organisation90 citing248 ITR 1 · 2001 · SC
- CIT v. Programme for Community Organisation73 citing228 ITR 620 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. Birla Janahit Trust17 citing208 ITR 372 · 1994 · HC
- CIT v. Hoechst Dyes and Chemicals Pvt Ltd.12 citing240 ITR 1 · 1999 · SC
- Parsi Zorastrian Anjuman Trust Mhow v. CIT9 citing163 ITR 832 · 1987 · HC
- Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Faizabad Circle6 citing131 ITD 335 · 2011 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI D. MANMOHAN
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.01.2015 passed by the CIT(Appeals)-14, Large Taxpayers Unit, Bangalore and pertains to assessment year 2011-12. 2. The assessee is an educational society and it obtained registration under the provisions of section 12A of the I.T. Act vide registration dated 27.5.2009. For the year under consideration, it filed its return of income wherein NIL income was declared after giving effect to provisions of section 11 of the Act.
The case was taken up for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee received gross amount of Rs.2,96,29,585 in the form of tuition fees from students, inter
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(1)(a)
- Sri Vidyanikethan Educational Trust… vs DCIT Exemption Cir, VijayawadaITA 412/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Porwal Charitable Trust, Thane vs The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 7604/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Jain Citizen Education Society, Surendra… vs ITO, Ward-2, Exmp, AhmedabadITA 737/AHD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Vanita Samaj, Mumbai vs Jurisdiction Exem Ward 2(4), MumbaiITA 8116/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026