DNYANGANGA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK BAHUUDDESHIYA MANDAL,BULDHANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 211/NAG/2023Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur07 May 2024Bench: SHRI V. DURGA RAO (Judicial Member), SHRI K.M. ROY (Accountant Member)2 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the assessee's submission and allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Dnyanganga Shikshan Prasarak Bahuuddeshiya Mandal, filed an appeal against the rejection of its application for an 80G(5) certificate. The assessee's counsel stated they did not wish to pursue the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the learned CIT(A) was justified in rejecting the assessee’s application for grant of 80G(5) certificate.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY

For Appellant: Shri S.C. Thakar
For Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

Date of Hearing – 07/05/2024 Date of Order – 07/05/2024

O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 18/05/2023, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (“the learned CIT(A)”).

2.

The only issue raised in this appeal by the assessee is, whether the learned CIT(A) was justified in rejecting the assessee’s application for grant of 80G(5) certificate.

Dnyanganga Shikshan Prasarak Bahuuddeshiya Mandal ITA no.211/Nag./2023

3.

When this case was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted before us that he did not wish to pursue this appeal and, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal.

4.

The learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the assessee.

5.

Having considered the submissions of the assessee, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn.

6.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order prondounced in the open Court on 07/05/2024.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →