HARSHARANKOUR GURMEETSINGH THETI,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3), NAGPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were invalid as Section 153C provides a specific mechanism for assessing income based on material found during a search belonging to a third party. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2012-13 arose from reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147. The reassessment was based on a sale purchase agreement found during a search at the premises of a third party.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 when Section 153C was the appropriate provision for assessing income based on material seized from a third party.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR “SMC” BENCH :NAGPUR [VIRTUAL HEARING]
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
Date of Hearing : 21.03.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 09.05.2024 ORDER
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13, arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short the “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/ 2022-23/1046434839(1), dated 21.10.2022, involving proceedings u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It emerges during the course of hearing that the first and foremost issue herein is that of validity of the impugned sec.147 proceedings itself since initiated on the basis of incriminating material/sale purchase agreement found/seized from the residential premises of the searched
2 ITA.No.417/NAG./2022 assessee late Shri Vijay Govindrao Kashikar on 21.07.2011. It is made clear that the legislature has already provided assessment of such third parties going by the relevant seized material; in sec.153C of the Act which is a special provision and complete Code in itself in light of the tribunal’s Third Member’s decision in Tarun Devon (P)
Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Jabalpur dated 09.10.2023.
Learned DR could hardly rebut of these clinching facts as well as intervening legal developments. Faced with this situation, I hereby quash the impugned sec.148/147 proceedings in very terms. Ordered accordingly.
All other pleadings on merits stand rendered academic.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 09.05.2024.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026