MAHILA UTKARSHA PRATISTAN,RISOD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), NAGPUR

PDF
ITA 342/NAG/2023Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur13 May 2024AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBERL, SHRI K.M. ROY (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI SHRI V. DURGA RAOL & SHRI K.M. ROY

For Appellant: Shri Abhay Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M.

The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 29/08/2023, for the A.Y. 2014–15, and orders of even date 28/08/2023, for the A.Y. 2015–16 and 2016–17, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“the learned CIT(A)”].

2.

When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order and prayed that one more opportunity may be given to the assessee to substantiate its case before the learned CIT(A).

Mahila Utkarsha Pratishtan ITA no.341-343/Nag./2023

3.

On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative strongly supported the order passed by the learned CIT(A).

4.

We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through order of the authorities below. We find that the order passed by the learned CIT(A) is an ex-parte order. By considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and also by following the principles of natural justice, one more opportunity should be given to the assessee to substantiate his case before the learned CIT(A). Thus, we set aside the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) and remit the matter to the file of the learned CIT(A) and direct him to adjudicate the matter afresh after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. It is also directed that the assessee should not seek adjournment without there being a justified reason. Accordingly, all the grounds raised by the assessee in these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 13/05/2024.

Sd/- Sd/- R.M. ROY V. DURGA RAO ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER NAGPUR, DATED: 013/05/2024

Mahila Utkarsha Pratishtan ITA no.341-343/Nag./2023

Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur

MAHILA UTKARSHA PRATISTAN,RISOD vs ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), NAGPUR | BharatTax