No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
ITA no.566/Nag./2016 (Assessment Year : 2008–09) M/s. SMS Infrastructure Ltd. 267, Ganesh Phadnavis Bhawan ……………. Appellant Dharampeth, Nagpur 440 010 PAN – AACCS9854P v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Central Circle–2(3), Nagpur Assessee by : Shri Saket Bhattad Revenue by : Shri Abhay Marathe
Date of Hearing – 03/06/2024 Date of Order – 03/06/2024
O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 31/08/2016, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–3, Nagpur, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2008-09.
In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:–
“(1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Id. CIT (Appeal) has erred in confirming order u/s 154 passed by AO disallowing claim of Rs. 3,45,03,153/- u/s. 801A of I.T. Act. The order u/s 154 is bad in law and illegal. (2) The learned authorities below ought to have seen that the assessee was prevented by reasonable and sufficient cause in filling the return within time u/s. 139(1) of I.T. Act. The assessee has made substantive compllance to the provisions of sec. 801A of the Act. The delay in filling the return is not willful and the assessee has not been benefited by filling the return late.
M/s. SMS Infrastructure Ltd. ITA no.566/Nag./2016
(3) That any other grounds may be raised during the course of hearing of this appeal.”
Facts in brief:- The assessee is a company engaged in the business of development of infrastructure projects. The assessee’s due date of filing of return of income under section 131 Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") was on 30/09/2008, however, the return of income was filed belated on 08/12/2008, in which it claimed deduction of ` 4,49,96,757 under section 80IA of the Act. Subsequently, the assessee filed a revised computation of income on 26/12/2008, claiming deduction under section 80IA of the Act of ` 3,45,03,153. The Assessing Officer passed assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act on 31/12/2008, on a total income of ` 15,25,92,530, after allowing deduction of ` 3,45,03,153, under section 80IA of the Act. After completion of the assessment, a show cause notice dated 21/02/2011, under section 154 of the Act was served upon the assessee 25/02/2011, by the Assessing Officer proposing to withdraw the claim of ` 3,45,03,153, which was allowed under section 80IA of the Act, for the reason that the return of income filed by the assessee on 08/12/2008, was a belated return of income and, therefore, as per the provisions of section 80AC of the Act, no deduction under section 80IA of the Act would be allowed to the assessee. The assessee filed a reply to the show cause notice issued by the Assessing Officer under section 154 of the Act as under:-
“6. In response to show cause notice u/s 154, issued by the A.O., the assessee argued before the A.O. as under:- “In this case a search u/s. 132 of I. T. Act took place at business premises of the assessee on 28.11.2006 and 07.09.2007. During the course of search various books of accounts, documents, computer, server and hard disc were seized by the authorized officer of the Page | 2
M/s. SMS Infrastructure Ltd. ITA no.566/Nag./2016
department Inspection of documents was allowed late which resulted in belated filing of return. It is humbly submitted that the delay of 68 days in furnishing the return is not wilful. The assessee was prevented by reasonable and sufficient cause in filing the return in time. The assessee has benefited by filing the return late." not been benefited by filing the return late.”
The Assessing Officer, after considering the explanation of the assessee, he has rectified the mistake committed by him by allowing the claim of the assessee under section 80IA of the Act and passed under section 154 of the Act on 10/03/2011. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. The assessee being aggrieved filed appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the learned CIT(A) to decide all the grounds raised by the assessee afresh. The learned CIT(A), following the directions of the Tribunal, by relying upon various case laws, dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Once again, the assessee being aggrieved filed appeal before the Tribunal.
Before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that once the Assessing Officer allowed the claim of the assessee, he cannot disallow the same under section 154 of the Act. Originally the order passed by the Assessing Officer is not a mistake apparent on record and it cannot be rectified under section 154 of the Act. He further submitted that whether the Assessing Officer can invoke the provisions of section 154 in a case the claim is already allowed by him is a debatable issue and, therefore, the Assessing Officer was not justified in invoking the provisions of section 154.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative strongly supported the order passed by the learned CIT(A). Page | 3
M/s. SMS Infrastructure Ltd. ITA no.566/Nag./2016
We have heard the rival arguments, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below It is admitted fact that the assessee has filed a return of income belated and claimed under section 80IA of the Act. The Assessing Officer, without verifying whether the return of income is filed in time or not, allowed the claim. When the assessee is making a claim, he has to file return of income in time otherwise as per the provisions of section 80AC of the Act, no deduction under section 80ITA of the Act would be allowed. Prima-facie, the Assessing Officer committed a patent mistake allowing the claim of the assessee. The mistake committed by the Assessing Officer is a mistake apparent on record. In our opinion, the mistake committed by the Assessing Officer which is apparent on record can be rectified by the Assessing Officer under section 154 of the Act. In this case, the Assessing Officer has rightly invoked provisions of section 154 of the Act and rectified the mistake committed by him. Moreover, the rectification done by the Assessing Officer in this case is not at all a debatable issue for the reason that it is an admitted fact that the assessee filed return of income belatedly. As per the provisions of section 80AC of the Act, no claim can be allowed if the return of income is filed belatedly. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has rightly exercised his power and rectified the mistake and no debatable issue is involved. The learned Counsel for the assessee relied upon the following case laws in support of his arguments:-
i) DCIT v/s M/s. Rama Medicare Ltd., ITA no.183/Lkw./2019, order dated 08/11/2019; ii) CIT v/s Unitech Ltd., [2016] 6 ITR-OL 370 : 2015 scc oNlINE Del. 14712; Page | 4
M/s. SMS Infrastructure Ltd. ITA no.566/Nag./2016
iii) ITO v/s S. Venkataiah, ITA no.984/Hyd./2011, order dated 31/05/2012; iv) Manish Soni v/s ITO, ITA no.230/Gau./2019, order dated 17/06/2020; v) HIMUDA Nigam Vihar Shimla v/s ACIT, ITA no.480-481 & 972/Chd./2012, order dated 10/05/2019
On a perusal of the aforesaid case laws, we find that all of them are distinguishable in nature and the facts and circumstances are different, hence, not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. Consequently, we are decline to accept the same and accordingly in view of our findings as aforesaid, all the grounds raised by the assessee are dismissed.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 03/06/2024
Sd/- Sd/- K.M. ROY V. DURGA RAO ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
NAGPUR, DATED: 03/06/2024 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur