D. P. JAIN AND CO. INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3), NAGPUR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
ITA no.244/Nag./2023 ITA no.240/Nag./2023 (Assessment Year : 2011–12) (Assessment Year : 2012–13) ITA no.245/Nag./2023 ITA no.246/Nag./2023 (Assessment Year : 2014–15) (Assessment Year : 2013–14) ITA no.252/Nag./2023 ITA no.253/Nag./2023 (Assessment Year : 2015–16) (Assessment Year : 2016–17) ITA no.256/Nag./2023 (Assessment Year : 2017–18)
D.P. Jain and Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. U6, Himalaya Accord, Opp. Law College ……………. Appellant Amravati Road, Nagpur 440 010 PAN – AACCD1376K v/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Circle–1(3), Nagpur Assessee by : Shri Rajesh Loya Revenue by : Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Date of Hearing – 25/06/2024 Date of Order – 25/06/2024
O R D E R PER BENCH
When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned A.R. submitted that the assessee had filed appeals in electronic mode as well as filed appeals physically also. Insofar as appeals which were electronically filed are concerned, those appeals were already disposed off and order passed by the Tribunal. However, the present appeals before us which are listed for hearing today are duplicate appeal files which were filed physically. Therefore, these appeals which are listed today are prayed for withdrawal.
D.P. Jain and Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned A.R.
We have heard both the sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the request of the learned A.R., we hold that these appeals are not required any adjudication for the reason that the Tribunal have already heard these appeals and disposed off by passing appropriate order. Since the present appeals which were filed physically and being duplicate files, therefore, these appeals are liable to be dismissed.
In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee being duplicate files are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on the date of hearing i.e., on 25/06/2024.
Sd/- Sd/- A.M. ROY V. DURGA RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
NAGPUR, DATED: 25/06/2024 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur
