JAGADISH KRISHNAJI JOSHI,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 13(2), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals. The assessee was granted liberty to revive the appeals if the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax declined to issue the Final Certificate under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The assessee subsequently opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and received Form 3 from the specified authority.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw the appeals due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: These are the appeals filed by the assessee directed against the separate orders dated 14.07.2023 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 respectively.
When the matter was called for hearing, Miss Neha Paranjpe appeared virtually and requested before the Bench to permit the assessee to withdraw both the above appeals in the light of the fact that the assessee has already filed Form 1 and 2 on 18.10.2024 under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and has also received Form 3 from the specified authority. She also draw our attention to the adjournment letter filed on 23.12.2024 wherein along with adjournment request the fact of opting Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 was mentioned.
On the other hand, Ld. DR has no objection to permit the assessee to withdraw these appeals.
We are inclined to grant the permission to the appellant herein to withdraw the appeals with the liberty to the appellant to revive the appeals proceedings, in the event of the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax declining to issue Final Certificate under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 for whatsoever reasons. Accordingly, the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, both the above captioned appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced on this 26th day of December, 2024. (R. K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 26th December, 2024. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.
""यथ" / The Respondent.
The Pr. CIT concerned. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “A” ब"च, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shalini Vishwakarma vs. Icici BankMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026