ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs. FAIZ ZAKIR VALI, NAGPUR

PDF
ITA 231/NAG/2022Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur06 August 2024AY 2010-11Bench: SHRI V. DURGA RAO (Judicial Member)2 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

For Appellant: Smt. Veen Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

ITA no.231/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2010–11) Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Appellant Central Circle–2(1), Nagpur v/s Faiz Zakir Vali 1, Universal Square ……………. Respondent 1505/1, Shantinagar, Nagpur 440 002 PAN – ABBPV9750E Assessee by : Smt. Veen Agrawal Revenue by : Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

Date of Hearing – 01/08/2024 Date of Order – 06/08/2024

O R D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M.

The appeal has been filed by the Revenue challenging the impugned order dated 06/06/2022, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–3, Nagpur, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2010–11.

2.

In its appeal, though the Revenue has raised inasmuch as nine grounds, however, the sole issue raised in this appeal is, whether or not the the learned CIT(A) were justified in deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") for ` 1,04,13,300.

3.

Having heard both the parties, we find that the sole issue of imposing penalty arose out of the quantum additions made by the Assessing Officer

Faiz Zakir Vali ITA no.231/Nag./2022

which was confirmed by the learned CIT(A). However, when the matter travelled before us, these quantum additions were deleted by us in assessee’s appeal being ITA no.65/Nag./2021, for the assessment year 2010–11, vide order dated 06/08/2024. Consequently, we hold that since the quantum additions are deleted, penalty levied on such quantum additions have no legs to stand. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are dismissed. Since the substratum of imposing penalty is destroyed, we refrain from adjudicating upon the merits of the case.

4.

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 06/08/2024

Sd/- Sd/- V. DURGA RAO K.M. ROY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

NAGPUR, DATED: 06/08/2024 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs FAIZ ZAKIR VALI, NAGPUR | BharatTax