VASUNDHARA BAHUDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA,KHAMGAON vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

PDF
ITA 373/NAG/2023Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 August 2024AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI V. DURGA RAO (Judicial Member)2 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

For Appellant: Shri Smt. Veena Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

ITA no.372/Nag./2023 (Assessment Year : 2023–24) ITA no.373/Nag./2023 (Assessment Year : 2023–24) Vasundhara Bahuddeshiya Samajik Sanstha Vasundhara Madhav Nagar ……………. Appellant Khamgaon 444 303 PAN – AADTV6377J v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Circle–15(1)(1), Nagpur Assessee by : Shri Smt. Veena Agrawal Revenue by : Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

Date of Hearing – 08/08/2024 Date of Order – 14/08/2024

O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 20/09/2023, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), National Faceless Appeal Center, Delhi, [“learned CIT(E)”], for the assessment year 2023–24.

2.

In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:–

“1. Whether the Ld. AO is justified in law and fact in rejecting application under Sec 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the Ld. AO is justified in law and fact in passing an order without properly appreciating the facts and documents produced on record.

Vasundhara Bahuddeshiya Samajik Sanstha ITA no.373–373/Nag./2023

3.

Whether Ld. AO is justified in pas passing an order in breach of natural justice. 4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify and withdraw any grounds before or during the course of appellate proceedings.”

3.

When the case was called for hearing, the learned A.R. on behalf of the assessee submitted that She did not wish to press this appeal, to which, the learned Departmental Representative did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.

4.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 14/08/2024

Sd/- Sd/- K.M. ROY V. DURGA RAO ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

NAGPUR, DATED: 14/08/2024 Copy of the order forwarded to: 1 (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur

VASUNDHARA BAHUDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA,KHAMGAON vs CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE | BharatTax