SUSANTA KUMAR MOHAPATRA,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee's claim was genuine and that the rectification petition should not have been dismissed. The issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, considering the assessee's NRI status and income source from abroad.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), mistakenly disclosed salary income from abroad under the head 'income from salary' in his return. He filed a rectification petition under Section 154 to correct this, but it was rejected by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was correct in rejecting the assessee's claim for rectification of a mistake under Section 154 regarding the classification of income earned abroad by an NRI.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
per the Board’s circular No.549 dated 31.10.1989, the assessee income
cannot be less than the Returned income and, therefore, changing of
income from Rs.20,57,677/- to Nil income cannot be considered as mistake
apparent from record and, finally rejected the petition and Assessed the
total income at Rs.20,57,677/- and passed order u/s.154(3)/154 on
3.7.2015.
Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed appeal with the CIT(A).
The ld CIT(A) confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer, Hence, the
assessee has filed appeal before the Tribunal.
3 ITA No. 37/ CTK/2017 Asse ssment Year :20 10- 201 1
Before us, Ld A.R. of the assessee argued that non-resident is
staying abroad and by mistake disclosed the salary income from abroad
under the head “income from salary” which is not taxable and filed copy
of acknowledgement of return of income for assessment year 2010-2011,
wherein, it was mention as “ exempt income tax due to NRI” and prayed
for allowing the appeal. On the other hand, ld D.R. relied on orders of lower
authorities.
We heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of lower
authorities and materials available on record. Prima facie, we find the
assessee as per the statement of facts, is a non-resident and income is
received from outside India and there is no scrutiny assessment u/s.143(3)
of the Act. Further, the assessee has filed rectification u/s.154 of the Act,
which was dismissed by the Assessing officer ignoring the facts of accrual
of income out side India. We find that the assessee should not be denied
the benefit as the facts are clear and genuine. Further, we relying on the
CBDT Circular No.14(XL-35) dated 11.4. 1955 and remit the disputed issue
to the file of the Assessing officer to adjudicate afresh considering the
status of the assessee as NRI and the source of income from abroad and
further the assessee should be provided adequate opportunity of hearing,
and shall submit relevant documents and supporting evidences in respect
of his claim and co-operate with the Assessing Officer in completing the
assessment. Accordingly, we remit the disputed issue to the file of the
4 ITA No. 37/ CTK/2017 Asse ssment Year :20 10- 201 1
Assessing Officer and allow the ground of appeal of the assessee for
statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical
purposes.
Order pronounced on 31 /05/2017 Sd/- sd/- (N.S Saini) (Pavan Kumar Gadale) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIALMEMBER Cuttack; Dated 31 /05/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Susanta Kumar Mohapatra, C/O AASA & Associates, Plot No.1149, Govind Prasad Bomikhal, Bhubaneswar 2. The Respondent. DCIT, (Intl.Taxation), Bhubaneswar. 3. The CIT(A)-3, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT-3, Bhubaneswar 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack BY ORDER, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026