BHASKAR RAO VARANASI,KORAPUT vs. ITO, JEYPORE WARD, JEYPORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 97/CTK/2017Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 May 2017AY 2010-112 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal inferred that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the appeal. Following precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2010-2011. Despite a notice being sent by Speed Post, the assessee did not respond or appear for the hearing.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee's non-appearance and lack of response.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK

Before: SHRI N.S SAINI

For Respondent: Shri B.N.Dash, DR

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-1,

Bhubaneswar, dated 23.11.2016, for the assessment year 2010-2011.

2.

Notice dated 13.4.2017 posting the appeal for hearing on 31.5.2017

and sent to the assessee by Speed Post at the address given in Form No.36,

has not evoked any response from the assessee. It is therefore inferred

that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal before the

Tribunal, which is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution following the

2 ITA No. 97/ CTK/2017 Asse ssment Year : 20 10- 201 1

decision of the Delhi Benches of the Tribunal in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan

India (P) Ltd. (1991) 38 ITD 320.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 31 /05/2017.

Sd/- (N.S Saini) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 31 /05/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Sri Bhaskar Rao Varanasi, Main Road, PO: Boipariguda, Koraput 2. The Respondent. ITO, Jeypore Ward, Jeypore 3. The CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT-1, Bhubaneswar. 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER,

SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →