SARADA DEVI MADDI,WARANGAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, WARAMGAL
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a duplicate appeal. Since the assessee did not wish to pursue the appeal and it was not maintainable, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee later realized that a similar appeal challenging the same order was already filed and was also scheduled for hearing. Due to this confusion, the assessee did not wish to pursue the present appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether a duplicate appeal filed by the assessee challenging an order already under appeal before the same tribunal was maintainable.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R.K. Panda, Vice-President AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member आ.अपी.सं / (िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Smt.Sarada Devi Maddi Vs. Income Tax Officer Warangal Ward-1 PAN:ABYPM0616M Warangal (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा��रती �ारा/Assessee by: Shri B Srinivasa Rao, CA राज� व �ारा/Revenue by:: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 11/01/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 11/01/2024 ORDER Per Laliet Kumar, J.M This appeal is filed at the instance of the assessee. At the time of hearing, the Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the assessee has filed another appeal bearing which is also fixed for hearing today challenging the same appellate order dated 6.9.2023. It was submitted that on account of some confusion, the present appeal was also filed by the assessee. In view of the above, the assessee does not wish to pursue this appeal and prayed that this appeal may be dismissed which was erroneously filed before the Hon’ble ITAT.
The Learned Departmental Representative has no objection in this regard for dismissing the appeal of the assessee. Page 1 of 2
We have heard the rival arguments and perused the available material on record. Since the present appeal is duplicate appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order which is also subject matter in ITA 538/Hyd/2023, hence the assessee cannot challenge an appellate order in two appeals. Under these circumstances, the present appeal is the 2nd appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed being not maintainable.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026