No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR REVIEW PETITION NO.789/2015 IN ITA NO.139/2015
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX C.R. BUILDING, ATTAVARA, MANGALORE
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3), C.R. BUILDING, ATTAVARA, MANGALORE
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.DILIP & SRI.E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATES FOR SRI.ARAVIND.K.V, ADVOCATE)
2 AND:
M/S. TEACHER’S CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD P.B.NO.9,VITTAL-574 243 BANTWAL TALUK PAN:AAALTO180G
...RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED:01/09/2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.139/2015, ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
We have heard Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, with Mr.Dilip, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. The only ground of review pressed in service in the present petition is the decision of this Court in ITA No.5006/2013 which is carried by the Department before the Apex Court and the SLP is pending.
3 3. In our view, such can hardly be termed as a valid ground for review. When the issue was already covered by the decision of this Court and this Court has found that there is no substantial question of law involved, we do not find that such decision deserves to be reviewed on the ground as sought to be canvassed. 4. Hence, there is no merit in the review petition. Therefore, dismissed. 5. Since the petition is dismissed, the office objection shall not survive.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
JT/-