PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
What did the High Court hold?
The petitioner's counsel submitted a memo to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the High Court took the memo on record and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
PNB Metlife India Insurance Company Limited filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The company also sought to stay the enforcement of a demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the challenge to an ITAT order and a demand notice. However, the case was resolved by the petitioner withdrawing the petition.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, in S.P.No.112/Bang/2016
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
WRIT PETITION NO.39535/2016 (T-IT)
Between:
PNB Metlife India Insurance Company Limited A Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 Unit No.701, 702 & 703, 7th Floor West Wing, Raheja Towers 26/27 MG Road, Bangalore – 560 001. Represented herein by its Deputy Director – Legal Mr.P.M.Anil Aged about 43 years.
Formerly at: No.5, Brigade Seshamahal, Vani Vilas Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-560 004. …Petitioner
(By Sri.T.Suryanarayana, Advocate)
And:
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle 5(1) (2)
[Formerly Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle 12 (1)]
2nd Floor, BMTC Complex
80 Feet Road, Koramangala
- 2 -
Bangalore – 560 095.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V
BMTC Complex
80 Feet Road, Koramangala
Bangalore – 560 095. ... Respondents
(By Sri.E.I.Sanmathi, Advocate)
This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated: 15.07.2016 vide Annexure-S passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in S.P.No.112/Bang/2016 in ITA No.1508/Bang/2015 for the assessment years 2011-12 and directing the respondents not to enforce the demand pursuant to the notice of demand dated 18.3.2014 (Annexure-B) issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of the assessment year 2011-2012, till the disposal of the appeal filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal and etc.
This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a memo for withdrawing the petition.
The memo shall be taken on record. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE tsn*
More judgments on Section 156
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Sagarmal Mall, Kolkata vs D.C.I.T., Circle - 32, KolkataITA 195/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Bhavesh Rameshbhai Patel, Naroda vs Asst. Unit. Income Tax Dept. (Present Juri…ITA 321/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Prabha Commercial Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 5(1), KolkataITA 2543/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2013-2014
- Maheshwari Brothers, Mumbai vs ITO - 19(2)(2), MumbaiITA 4115/MUM/2026[2008-09]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2008-09
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026