BRIJESH PODDAR M/S KRISHAN KANHAIYA TEXTILES,HATHARS vs. ITO WARD 4(3)(4), HATHRAS
Facts
The assessee, Shri Brijesh Poddar, claimed a deduction of Rs. 5,74,560 for interest paid on a loan used to invest in virtual digital assets (cryptocurrency). The Assessing Officer and NFAC disallowed this deduction, arguing it was not permissible under Section 57 or Section 115BBH(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Held
The tribunal held that the interest expenditure on the loan, directly linked to the acquisition of virtual digital assets, should be considered part of the cost of acquisition. Since Section 115BBH(2) allows for the deduction of the cost of acquisition, the assessee is entitled to claim the interest as a deduction while computing short-term capital gains.
Key Issues
The key legal issue was whether interest paid on a loan used to acquire virtual digital assets can be treated as part of the cost of acquisition and thus be deductible when computing short-term capital gains under Section 115BBH(2).
Sections Cited
Section 57, Section 115BBH(2), Section 143(1), Section 143(3), Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “SMC”: AGRA
The appeal in ITA No. 528/AGR/2025 for AY 2023-24, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 08.10.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 12.03.2025 by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-4(3)(4), Hathras (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
The only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the assessee would be entitled for deduction of Rs 5,74,560/- on account of interest paid on loan in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
I have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee electronically filed his return for the
ITA No. 528/AGR/2025 Shri Brijesh Poddar (Prop)
assessment year 2023-24 on 30-12-2023 declaring total income of Rs. 18,07,160. This return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act on 30-12-2023 accepting the returned income. In the said return, the assessee had shown income under the head short-term capital gains on virtual digital assets. The assessee furnished the computation of short-term capital gains on virtual digital asset together with the complete summary transaction of virtual digital assets before the learned AO. The assessee submitted that he had borrowed loan and had made investment in virtual digital asset (cryptocurrency) which is a capital asset. Accordingly, the interest expenditure on loan was actually incurred for acquiring the capital asset which would be eligible for deduction while computing the short-term capital gains. The assessee actually claimed deduction on account of interest expenditure on loan in the sum of Rs. 5,74,560 under Section 57 of the Act under the head income from other sources in the return of income. But during the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee pleaded that alternatively the said interest expenditure would be eligible for deduction while computing the income under the head short- term capital gains as borrowed funds were utilised for making investment in virtual digital asset and that the interest becomes part of cost of acquisition. This plea was not accepted by the learned AO and the interest expenditure of Rs. 5,74,560 was disallowed by the learned AO under Section 57 of the Act while completing the assessment on 12-03-2025. This action of the learned AO was upheld by the learned NFAC.
I find that assessee had taken loan from Mrs. New Poddar Garments, Hathras on which interest of Rs. 5,74,560 has been paid. This loan was invested by the assessee in virtual digital assets (cryptocurrency). This fact is not in dispute before me. Hence the direct nexus of loan taken and the amount invested is established beyond reasonable doubt by the assessee.
ITA No. 528/AGR/2025 Shri Brijesh Poddar (Prop)
It is a fact that the assessee had claimed interest on loan in the sum of Rs. 5,74,560 as deduction under the head income from other sources in the return of income. In my considered opinion, this deduction of interest should have been claimed by the assessee under the head short-term capital gains as the interest would become part of cost of acquisition itself in view of the fact that only the borrowed funds were utilized for making investment in virtual digital assets. But this plea was wrongly rejected by the learned AO. The interest expenditure on loan also would become part of cost of acquisition of the assessee. I find that the lower authorities had applied the provisions of section 115BBH(2) of the Act which prohibits grant of deduction or allowance for any expenditure other than cost of acquisition. But I have already held that interest expenditure would be part of cost of acquisition of the assessee and since cost of acquisition is allowed as deduction under section 115BBH(2) of the Act, the assessee would be entitled to claim deduction on account of interest paid in the sum of Rs 5,74,560 while computing short-term capital gains on virtual digital assets. Accordingly the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 03/02/2026.
-Sd/- (M. BALAGANESH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 03/02/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent
ITA No. 528/AGR/2025 Shri Brijesh Poddar (Prop)
CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
