SMT. MANDA THETE,NAGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the issues back to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment. The AO is directed to pass a fresh order after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present facts and evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return of income, which was assessed under Section 143(3). Subsequently, the AO initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 148 regarding unsecured loans, which the CIT(A) confirmed. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
The key legal issues are the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 and the treatment of unsecured loans as unexplained, particularly regarding the proof of identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH ‘SMC’, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
(A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.47/JAB/2025 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 against impugned appellate order dated 03/01/2025 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1071862626(1) of National Faceless Appeal Centre [“NFAC” for short]. Grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. That the order passed us 250 by the CIT(Appeals) faceless is invalid and unlawful on the facts and circumstances of the case. Assessment Year: 2012-13 2
That the CIT Appeals faceless erred in confirming the action of A.O. us 148 notice dated 30.03.2019 in confirming the reasons recorded for treating the unsecured loans for Rs. 3140045 which has already been proved and accepted by the A
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026