MOHOMMED IRSHAD SAUDAGER,BAIHAR, BALAGHAT vs. ASSESSING OFFICER / INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD, BALAGHAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT noted that both the assessment order and the CIT(A)'s order were passed ex parte without providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the issues to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment after giving the assessee a proper opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was reassessed under Section 147 read with Section 144B, resulting in additions that increased the total income. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal against this assessment. The assessee then appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was whether the assessment and appellate orders, passed ex parte without reasonable opportunity to the assessee, were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
(A)
This appeal vide I.T.A. No.189/JAB/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2018-19 against impugned appellate order dated 21.11.2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1070524730(1) of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short]. (B)
In this case, assessment order dated 16.03.2023 was passed u/s 147 read with section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”, for short) whereby the assessee’s total income was determined at Rs.10,66,769/- as against returned income of Rs.2,60,470/- by making various additions. The assessee’s appeal against the assessment order was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026