RAMKRISHNA ARJARIYA ,CHHATARPUR vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER, CHHATARPUR

ITA 163/JAB/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur27 February 2026AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA (Accountant Member)2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer. The AO was directed to pass a de novo assessment order in accordance with law after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard, similar to the decision for AY 2017-18.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2018-19 against an order from the CIT(A). The facts of this case were identical to a previous case of the same assessee for AY 2017-18, where the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment.

What were the issues?

The key legal issue was whether the assessment for AY 2018-19 should be restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, given the identical facts to a previous assessment year for the same assessee.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR

Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, Advocate

PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.:

(A). This appeal vide I.T.A. No.163/JAB/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2018-19 against impugned appellate order dated 26.08.2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1067996452(1) of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)”, for short]. (B) The facts of the present case are identical to those considered by the Coordinate Bench in the case of the same assessee, in Ramkrishan Arjariya vs ITO, ITA No. 162/JAB/2024, vide order dated 29.08.2025. In the said case, for Assessment Year 2017-18, the issue in dispute was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer (“AO”, for short) with a direction to pass a de novo assessment order in accordance with law after affording reasonable op

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →