AAKASH KHATEEK,TIKAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TIKAMGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment. The Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the assessee before passing a fresh order.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was assessed at Rs. 27,45,350 under Section 144/147, with an addition for unexplained cash credit under Section 69A. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) did not provide a reasonable opportunity.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was whether the CIT(A) provided a reasonable opportunity to the assessee before dismissing the appeal, and the validity of the addition for unexplained cash credit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH ‘SMC’, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
(A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.69/JAB/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2012-13 against impugned appellate order dated 20/03/2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1063027806(1) of National Faceless Appeal Centre [“NFAC” for short].
(B) The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessment order dated 13.12.2019 was passed under section 144/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) whereby the total income was determined at Rs. 27,45,350/-. In the aforesaid assessment order, an addition of Rs. Assessment Year: 2012-13 2
27,45,350/- was made on account of unexplained cash credit under section 69A of the Act. The assessee filed an appeal in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026