MULCHAND JAGANATH RAGIT,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 3(4), NAGPUR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO
This appeal by the assessee is against the impugned order dated 29/06/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2016–17.
The assessee has raided following grounds:–
“1. The learned CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering the merits of the case. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that, the notice issued u/s 148 was bad in law. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of learned AO in making an addition on account of capital gains arising from sale of immovable property under section 45 r.w.s 50C at Rs.11,54,870.
2 Mulchand Jaganath Ragit 4. The learned AO erred in not providing complete benefit of deduction towards cost of acquisition, improvement, and indexation thereon while computing the long-term capital gain. 5. The Appellant prays leave of the Hon'ble Tribunal to add, amend, alter any of the Grounds of Appeal.
When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned A.R. appearing for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order and prayed that one opportunity may be granted by restoring the matter to the file of the learned CIT(A) to enable the assessee to substantiate its case before the learned CIT(A).
On the other hand, the learned D.R. submitted that despite the learned CIT(A) provided sufficient opportunities to the assesse, however, the assessee did not appeared before the learned CIT(A) and not furnished relevant details. He strongly supported the orders passed by the learned CIT(A).
I have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through orders of the authorities below. We find that though the learned CIT(A) granted opportunities to the assessee to substantiate its case, ultimately, the order passed by him is an ex-parte order. Therefore, I am of the opinion that by following the principles of natural justice, one opportunity should be given to the assesse to substantiate the case before the learned CIT(A). In view of the above, the order passed by the learned CIT(A) is set aside and remit the matter to the file of the learned CIT(A) and direct him to adjudicate the matter afresh on merit and in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. It is also directed that the assessee should not seek adjournment without there being a
3 Mulchand Jaganath Ragit justified reason. Accordingly, all the grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 20/12/2024
Sd/- V. DURGA RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER NAGPUR, DATED: 20/12/2024 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur
