ANITA SHARMA L/H OF SH. SHYAM LAL,HISAR vs. ITO, WARD-4, HISAR, HISAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5944/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 October 2025AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the appeal back to the Assessing Officer to proceed afresh after verifying necessary facts and evidence. This was done in the interest of justice due to the lack of proper legal representation for the deceased assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2017-18 was filed by Smt. Anita Sharma, claiming to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee, Sh. Shyam Lal. The records did not indicate if she legally managed or succeeded to the estate of the deceased.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the proper legal standing of the appellant as the legal representative of the deceased assessee and whether the proceedings were correctly initiated against her.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 2(29),Section 2(11),Section 159

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

Hearing: 29.10.2025Pronounced: 29.10.2025

Date of hearing 29.10.2025 Date of pronouncement 29.10.2025 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079654502(1), dated 14.08.2025, involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It transpires during the course of hearing that the appellant herein, namely, Smt. Anita Sharma claims herself to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee Sh. Shyam Lal who is stated to have expired after institution of the lower appeal on 18.01.2020. That being the case, learned counsel could hardly dispute that there is no indication in the case records as to whether the appellant, the self-proclaimed legal representative herein, either manages or she has succeeded to estate of the deceased assessee as per section 2(29) of the Act r.w.s. 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Nor there is any indication in the case records that the learned departmental authorities have proceeded against her u/s 159 of the Act. Faced with this situation, it is deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the appellant’s instant appeal back to the learned Assessing Officer to proceed afresh after verifying all the necessary facts and evidence(s); within three effective opportunities, in consequential proceedings. All other remaining issue between the parties are kept open at this stage.

More judgments on Section 2(29)

All 77 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(29) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →