ANKUSH SALUJA,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5, DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was dismissed by the FAA on the grounds of non-representation without adjudicating on the merits or legal grounds. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to restore the issues on merits and law back to the files of the CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against an order passed by the DCIT under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution, which the assessee contested.
What were the issues?
Whether the dismissal of appeal by the FAA for non-prosecution was justified without adjudicating on merits and legal grounds, and whether the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: G : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ankush Saluja, Vs DCIT, 9-A, Jeevan Jyoti Farms, CC-5, The Greens, Delhi Rajokri, New Delhi – 110 038. PAN: AQDPS8677G (Appellants) (Respondents) Assessee by : Shri Raina Majumdar, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 06.10.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 29.10.2025 ORDER
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 21.03.2025 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in appeal No.CIT(A), Delhi-24/10647/2018-19 arising out of the appeal before it against the order dated 29.03.2024 passed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the DCIT, CC-05, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO).
ITAs No.3960/Del/2025
Heard. The delay of 17 days being not of any substantial consequences to prejudice of department is condoned.
Further, on hearing both the sides, we find that amongst other grounds on merits, the assessee has raised a ground that the ld. FAA has dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. On going through the impugned order and the material on record, we find that the assessee had also raised legal grounds before the ld. CIT(A) also. However, the NFAC has dismissed the appeal on the basis of non-representation without adjudicating on the merits and especially on the legal grounds.
Accordingly, we are inclined to restore the issues on merits as well as on law to the files of CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication after due notice to the assessee. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026