NARESH KUMAR,BALACHAUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MAWAMSHAHR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer for withdrawal, noting that the matter had already been set aside to the CIT(A) in a prior Tribunal order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2015-16, which arose from an order passed by the AO under Section 154. The assessee's counsel filed a withdrawal application stating that the matter had already been set aside by the Tribunal to the CIT(A) in a previous order, rendering the current appeal infructuous.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal was still maintainable given that the underlying matter had already been remanded by the Tribunal to the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA, JM
(निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Shri Naresh Kumar ITO बिधम/ VPO Nawapind, Taprian Bhatti Colony Vs. Tehsil Balachaur, Nawanshahar-144521 Nawanshahar-144514 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. DSSPK-2370-A (अपीलाथी/Appellant) : (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant by : Withdrawal Application dated 10-01-2026 प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Charan Dass (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 20-01-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 20-01-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC dated 09-01-2025 in the matter of an order passed by Ld. AO u/s 154 on 18-09-2023.
During hearing, the registry placed on record withdrawal application from assessee’s counsel on the ground that the matter has already been set aside by Tribunal to Ld. CIT(A) in vide order dated 11-08-2025 and therefore, this appeal has become infructuous. The Ld. Sr. DR did not raise any objection against the same.
Accepting the prayer of Ld. AR, the appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 20th January, 2026.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026