SAHAKARI VIPNAN EVAM PRAKRIYA SAMITI,UJJAIN vs. ITO-2(2), UJJAIN
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) granted full relief to the assessee in the appeal against the fresh assessment order. Therefore, the assessee requested to withdraw the current appeal as no grievance remained.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax. Subsequently, a fresh assessment order was passed pursuant to the revision order, and the assessee appealed that order to the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against the revision order is maintainable when a subsequent assessment order, passed in pursuance of the revision, has been decided in favour of the assessee by the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
This appeal filed by assessee is directed against the revision-order dated 28.03.2019 passed by learned Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ujjain [“Ld. PCIT”] u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”], which in turn arises out of the order of assessment dated 17.06.2016 passed by learned ITO-2(2), Ujjain [“the Ld. AO”] u/s 143(3) for Assessment-Year 2014-15.
When the case was taken up for hearing, the assessee filed an application stating that the revenue has already passed assessment-order on 28.11.2019 u/s 143(3) of the Act in pursuance of the aforesaid order dated 28.03.2019 appealed against in present appeal. Thereafter, the assessee filed an appeal against the assessment-order dated 28.11.2019 to Sahkari Vipnan Evam Prakriya Samiti Assessment Year 2014-15 Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) has already decided the appeal filed by the vide order dated 04.05.2022 wherein full relief has been granted to the assessee. A copy of appeal order is also filed by assessee on record. The assessee has requested that since the appeal against the assessment-order passed by Ld. AO in pursuance of the revision-order u/s 263 of the Act has already been decided in assessee’s favour, there does not survive any grievance to the assessee. Therefore, the assessee does not want to pursue this appeal and as such requested to withdraw the appeal.
We have considered the request of assessee to withdraw the appeal. We have also confronted the Ld. DR who did not have any objection if the withdrawal is permitted. Therefore, we allow withdrawal of this appeal as prayed for.
In the result, the present appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced as per Rule 34 of I.T.A.T. Rules 1963 on 25.07.2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026