LAKSHMANNA NAGI REDDY BUGUDE,YEMMIGANUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ADONI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 599/HYD/2024Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 August 2024AY 2017-18Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Manjunatha, G. (Accountant Member)6 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with one more opportunity to be heard and submit necessary documents, directing the assessee to appear without adjournment.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to comply with notices issued by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), leading to an ex-parte assessment. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A) despite prior non-compliance with statutory notices.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Manjunatha, G.

Hearing: 27/08/2024

आदेश/ORDER Per Laliet Kumar, J.M

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 01/03/2024 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, relating to A.Y.2017-18.

2.

The assessee raised the following grounds:

Page 1 of 6 Page 2 of 6 Page 3 of 6

3.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and has filed his return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 on 31.03.2018 declaring Gross Total Income of Rs. 10,70,701/-. As per the information available with the department the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has deposited cash of Rs. 1,48,13,500/- during the period of demonetization in her bank account. Consequently, notice u/s 148 and statutory notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act was issued and served on the assessee. Since the assessee did not comply with the notices, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment and assessed the total income of the assessee at Rs. Rs. 1,58,84,201/-.

4.

On appeal, the learned CIT (A) dismissed the appeal on the ground of non-compliance of the assessee to the notices issued by the Department.

5.

Aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT (A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

6.

The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that if given an opportunity, the assessee would be in a position to file all the necessary documents/details with evidence before the learned CIT (A).

7.

The learned DR, on the other hand, supporting the orders of the authorities below submitted that since the assessee

Page 4 of 6 failed to comply with the statutory notices issued by the Department, the orders of the authorities below should be upheld and the appeal filed by the assessee should be dismissed.

8.

We have heard both the parties, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. Admittedly, the assessee failed to appear before the Assessing Officer or the learned CIT (A). Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it proper to restore the issue back to the file of the learned CIT (A) to give one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The learned CIT (A) is directed to decide the issue on merit after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee shall appear and submit the requisite details before the learned CIT (A) at the appointed date without seeking any adjournment under any pretext. The assessee being Petrol Pump Owner is also hereby directed to pay nominal cost of Rs.4000/- at the Telangana State Legal Aide Authorities at the Hon'ble Telangana High Court within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order and submit proof to the Registry. We hold and direct accordingly.

9.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →