Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Representative prayed for setting aside the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and allow the grounds of the assessee.
Contra, the ld. Departmental Representative relied on the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and opposed to the grounds.
We heard the rival submissions, perused the material on record and evidences filed. The crux of the issue being the disallowance u/s.14A r.w.Rule 8D(2)(i)(ii) (iii) calculated by the ld. Assessing Officer. The ld. Authorised Representative submitted that ld. Assessing Officer has calculated the average of value of investments irrespective of the fact that there is no opening balance and closing balance in the previous year. The assessee has surplus noninterest bearing funds for investments in liquid funds. The ld. Authorised Representative drew our attention to the letter dated 29.11.2014 filed in the assessment proceeding explaining and objecting to the disallowance u/sec. 14A rws 8D as the assessee firm is having surplus funds and investments are made only in the mutual funds and there being is no opening and closing balance of value of investments and demonstrated the investment pattern by submitting JM Financial Mutual Fund account statement including reinvestment of