UNITED METAL INDUSTRIES,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 513/CHNY/2016Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 June 2016AY 2012-131 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and the material on record. The core issue revolved around the calculation of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.

What were the facts?

The assessee objected to the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The assessee argued that the disallowance was calculated on the average of investments without considering the opening and closing balances and that surplus non-interest bearing funds were used for investments in mutual funds.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the correctness of the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, specifically concerning the calculation method and the assessee's claim of using surplus non-interest bearing funds for investments.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Representative prayed for setting aside the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and allow the grounds of the assessee.

6.

Contra, the ld. Departmental Representative relied on the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and opposed to the grounds.

7.

We heard the rival submissions, perused the material on record and evidences filed. The crux of the issue being the disallowance u/s.14A r.w.Rule 8D(2)(i)(ii) (iii) calculated by the ld. Assessing Officer. The ld. Authorised Representative submitted that ld. Assessing Officer has calculated the average of value of investments irrespective of the fact that there is no opening balance and closing balance in the previous year. The assessee has surplus noninterest bearing funds for investments in liquid funds. The ld. Authorised Representative drew our attention to the letter dated 29.11.2014 filed in the assessment proceeding explaining and objecting to the disallowance u/sec. 14A rws 8D as the assessee firm is having surplus funds and investments are made only in the mutual funds and there being is no opening and closing balance of value of investments and demonstrated the investment pattern by submitting JM Financial Mutual Fund account statement including reinvestment of

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →